
|

||
Printer-Friendly Format ||
E-mail to a Friend
Is Human Growth Hormone the Answer to Aging?
Reported by JoAnne Purtan
Web produced by Kelly Reynolds
Some people searching for the
fountain of youth are turning to
the human growth hormone.
But can it really turn back the hands
of time?
The latest research
shows human growth hormone, or
HGH, has great promise, but at
what price?
Some are cautioning against the use of the hormone, while others swear by it.
Darlene Soave works out three to five
days a week, she watches what she
eats and takes dietary
supplements, but at 59,
she credits part of the youthful glow to human growth hormone.
"It made a big difference in
the way that the way that I felt,
the way that I looked, my skin texture, my structure of the muscles in
my arms, in my body and my
workout," Darlene said.
The human growth hormone is made by the pituitary
gland. It stimulates the growth
of tissue throughout the body, but the older we get, the less hormone we make.
"The chest drops and the waist
increases.
That is an increase in body fat,
that is a decrease in lean body
mass," said Dr. Edward Lichten.
Dr. Lichten, a Southfield doctor, has
researched and championed human growth hormones for years.
He has given injections to some
2,000 patients whose HGH
levels are less than normal for
their age.
"What I see in my patients is
a change of one or two inches
in their waistline in usually two to
three months of therapy," Dr. Lichten said.
Sounds to good to be true?
Researchers recently determined that
HGH was too risky for people
to use outside a controlled
study.
The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical
Association, did find that HGH
substantially increased lean body
mass and decreased fat mass. But many participants experienced side effects, like joint pain,
carpal tunnel, and an increased
risk of diabetes.
That's why a Henry Ford endocrinologist says growth hormones are not yet
the fountain of youth.
"What I would like to caution everyone is that it is a very promising
potential beneficial affect, but
it's not ready for primetime
yet," said Dr. Sudhaker Rao.
But Dr. Lichten has a real problem
with the JAMA study.
"The study doses used was way out of line.
It was completely excessive. It was 10 times more than it needed to be."
And 10 times more than Dr. Lichten uses in
patients like Darlene, who has never had a problem with the
hormones.
"I have always felt wow, that I feel wonderful now, that I have a
lot of energy, and I'm very happy I'm
doing what I'm doing," Darlene said.
Shots of HGH can cost more than
$15,000 a year, and they are only available by
prescription from a doctor.
||
Printer-Friendly Format ||
E-mail to a Friend
||
More Health News ||
Discussion Groups

|
 |